![]() They continued with what can seem a diagnosis of contemporary real estate desire. The head of the city is the Grand Factory, 4 miles wide and 100 yards high, like the city it continuously produces . . . The Grand Factory devours shreds of useless nature and unformed minerals at its front end and emits sections of completely formed city, ready for use, from its back end.” “The city moves,” they wrote, “unrolling like a majestic serpent over new lands, taking its 8 million inhabitants on a ride through valleys and hills, from the mountains to the seashore, generation after generation. Perhaps the best is their 1971 idea of the “Continuous Production Conveyor Belt City”. Not very well-known beyond the hermetic world of architectural theory, the Italian collective Superstudio left us with some of the most brilliant and critical parables in the history of modern urbanism. But do cities have to remain static? Could they avoid their destiny if they just moved on? Quite literally, they sink into the earth or the water as consecutive layers pile up above them. The one thing certain in urbanism is that all cities, no matter how great, at some point decline. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |